• Users Online: 347
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 40  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 203-210

Electrophysiological assessment of hand elevation test in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome


Department of Physical Medicine, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Sham University, Cairo, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
Takwa B Younes
Department of Physical Medicine, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Sham University, 11588 Cairo
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1110-161X.123808

Rights and Permissions

Background Provided that the hand elevation test can reproduce the symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), this phenomenon prompted the idea of developing a simple test to diagnose CTS. Aim The aim of this study was assess the electrophysiological values of the hand elevation test in the diagnosis of CTS syndrome. Patients and methods Thirty patients with initial symptoms and clinical signs of CTS in 49 hands were included. Special provocative tests for CTS were carried out before the hand elevation tests and the electrophysiological studies at least 5 min to avoid their effect on the intended test. The hand elevation test was performed and the test result was considered positive if symptoms occurred within 2 min. Nerve conduction study, including motor and sensory nerve conduction studies with F-wave study for both median nerves, was performed twice immediately before and after the hand elevation provocative test. Results This study was carried out on 60 hands; however, the initial complaint was in 49 hands, where the results showed a highly significant difference in parasthesia and hand pain, values of nerve conduction study (distal motor and sensory latencies) both before and after the hand elevation test, and a nonsignificant difference in the F-wave latencies. The posthand elevation distal motor and sensory latencies showed a sensitivity of 100 versus 78.6%, a specificity of 75 versus 81.2%, a positive predictive value of 77.8 versus 78.6%, and a negative predictive value of 100 versus 81.2%, respectively. Conclusion Hand elevation is a simple provocative test that could be the physical examination of choice and can be used as a first-order provocative test instead of other tests for the diagnosis of CTS. Its significant provocative value was documented electrophysiologically.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1472    
    Printed28    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded120    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal