Egyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2017  |  Volume : 44  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 111--117

Evaluation of disease activity markers in relation to dry eye disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis


Mohja A El-Badawy1, Amira R El-Mahdi2, Samia M Abd El Rehem1, Weam M Ebeid3, Rania S El-Kitkat3, Doaa M Abdelaziz4,  
1 Department of Physical Medicine, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Ain Shams University Hospitals, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
2 Department of Internal Medicine, Allergy and Immunology, Ain Shams University Hospitals, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
3 Department of Ophthalmology, Ain Shams University Hospitals, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
4 Department of Clinical Pathology, Ain Shams University Hospitals, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
Mohja A El-Badawy
Department of Physical Medicine, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, 211 Abdel-Hamid Keshk Street, Hadaeq EL-Quba, Cairo
Egypt

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to correlate the presence of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) and anti-mutated citrullinated vimentin (anti-MCV) antibodies with rheumatoid disease activity and dry eye disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients and methods A total of 69 patients were evaluated for the activity of RA using the Disease Activity Score (DAS-28), erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein. We used the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index to assess functional disability. Anti-CCP and anti-MCV antibodies were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique. We assessed dry eye symptoms using Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire. Clinical tests used for dry eye assessment included Schirmer’s test, tear breakup time test, and ocular surface fluorescein staining. Results Anti-CCP antibody serum levels significantly correlated with DAS (r=0.46, P=0.036), Schirmer’s test (r=0.40, P=0.038), and ocular surface fluorescein staining (r=0.6, P=0.04). Anti-MCV antibody serum levels correlated with DAS (r=0.5, P=0.04), ocular surface fluorescein staining (r=0.9, P=0.007), and OSDI score (r=0.3, P=0.03). DAS showed a nonsignificant correlation with OSDI score and all tests of dry eye. OSDI score significantly correlated with Schirmer’s test (P=0.036). Conclusion Dry eye is the most common ocular manifestation in our investigated patients with RA. Dry eye disease existence is not correlated with disease activity, hence all patients with RA should be regularly examined for dye eye regardless of disease severity. Rheumatologists could use the OSDI questionnaire for screening dry eye disease in patients with RA. The presence of anti-CCP and anti-MCV antibodies may denote the existence of dry eye disease and correlates with RA disease activity.



How to cite this article:
El-Badawy MA, El-Mahdi AR, Abd El Rehem SM, Ebeid WM, El-Kitkat RS, Abdelaziz DM. Evaluation of disease activity markers in relation to dry eye disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Egypt Rheumatol Rehabil 2017;44:111-117


How to cite this URL:
El-Badawy MA, El-Mahdi AR, Abd El Rehem SM, Ebeid WM, El-Kitkat RS, Abdelaziz DM. Evaluation of disease activity markers in relation to dry eye disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Egypt Rheumatol Rehabil [serial online] 2017 [cited 2024 Mar 28 ];44:111-117
Available from: http://www.err.eg.net/text.asp?2017/44/3/111/212040


Full Text



 Introduction



Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a common systemic autoimmune disease. It is mainly characterized by persistent joint inflammation that results in the loss of joint function and morbidity [1],[2].

Extra-articular manifestations in patients with RA may involve a multiplicity of organs and are of diverse severity [3],[4]. Ocular involvement in patients with RA is variable and may arise independently of other forms of extra-articular diseases [5].The common ocular findings of RA are keratoconjunctivitis sicca, anterior uveitis, episcleritis, necrotizing nodular scleritis, and scleromalacia perforans [6],[7].

Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies can be detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique, and detection of these antibodies was found to be a more specific serum test for RA than the rheumatoid factor (RF) titer [8].

Several studies demonstrated that anti-mutated citrullinated vimentin (anti-MCV) antibodies have the same specificity as anti-CCP antibodies, but with better sensitivity [9],[10],[11]. Other studies support that detection of anti-MCV is as useful as anti-CCP assay in distinguishing patients with RA from healthy controls [9],[12], and it can help in the differential diagnosis of RA from other rheumatic diseases [13],[14],[15]. Moreover, a significant correlation has been established between anti-MCV antibody titers and both the severity of RA and Disease Activity Score (DAS) [16],[17],[18].

The aim of our study was to correlate the presence of anti-CCP and anti-MCV antibodies with rheumatoid disease activity and dry eye disease in patients with RA.

 Patients and methods



The Ethical Committee of Ain Shams University approved this study, and all patients signed an informed consent before participation.

We recruited 69 patients fulfilling the 2010 American College of Rheumatology and European League against Rheumatism classification criteria for RA [19] from the Physical Medicine, Rheumatology, and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic of Ain Shams University Hospitals.

Exclusion criteria were

Pregnant or nursing patients, smokers, and patients having other connective tissue diseases, autoimmune disorders, malignancy, and chronic infection/inflammation were excluded. We also excluded individuals who had any active eye infection or allergy, lid deformity or abnormal lid movement, or abnormal nasolacrimal drainage. Contact lens wearers, patients using topical steroids and other anti-inflammatory treatment for the last 3 months, patients using artificial tears for at least 8 h before examination, patients who performed any refractive surgery within 1 year of the study visit, and patients having any other systemic disease or on long-term systemic medications known to affect tear production were also excluded.

Clinical assessment

Evaluations of patients with RA included full history taking with recording of disease duration, and thorough physical examination, with particular focus on joint pattern involvement, presence of extra-articular manifestations, and ongoing medications.

We assessed DAS-28 in all patients. The DAS-28 includes a count of 28 tender joints, a count of 28 swollen joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and a general health assessment on a visual analog scale. The 28 tender joint count and 28 swollen joint count both range from 0 to 28. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) may range from 0 to 150, and general health ranges from 0 to 100. The range of the DAS-28 is 0–9.4. Mild disease activity was assigned to patients with score of 3.2 or less, moderate was more than 3.2 to less than or equal to 5.1, and high activity was more than 5.1. A DAS-28 less than 2.6 corresponds with being in remission according to the American Rheumatism Association criteria [20].

We used the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) to quantify functional disability [21]. The HAQ-DI includes items that assess fine movements of the upper extremity, locomotor activities of the lower extremity, and activities that involve both the upper and lower extremities. There are 20 items in eight categories that represent a comprehensive set of functional activities [22].

Scoring of the HAQ-DI is modeled after the American Rheumatism Association/American College of Rheumatology functional classes [23].

Ophthalmological examination

All patients recruited in the study filled the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire forms for measuring the severity of dry eye disease symptoms. OSDI is a 12-item questionnaire designed to provide a rapid assessment of the symptoms of ocular irritation consistent with dry eye disease [24].

The 12 items of the OSDI questionnaire are graded on a scale of 0 to 4. The total score is then calculated using the following formula: OSDI=(Sum of scores for all questions answered)×100/(total number of questions answered)×4.Thus, the OSDI is scored on a scale of 0–100, with higher scores representing greater disability. A specific scale is designed, according to the score and the number of questions answered, to detect the severity of dry eye disease as normal, mild, moderate, or severe, using different shades of red in the scale for easier detection [25].

Subsequently, we performed a thorough examination for detection of dry eye disease, including the following tests done in order: Schirmer I-test [26], tear breakup time (TBUT) test, and fluorescein ocular surface staining (with grading of staining following the Oxford schema) [27].

Schirmer I-test was performed using Whitman filter paper placed for 5 min between the eyeball and the most lateral part of the inferior lid (without anesthesia). After 5 min, the strips were removed, and amount of wetting noted. Values of 15 mm wetting or more are considered normal, those of 9–14 mm are mild dry eye, 4–8 mm are moderate, and less than 4 mm are severe dry eye [26].

TBUT was measured by staining the conjunctival sac with 2% fluorescein strips wetted with saline and then the patient is examined under slit lamp using cobalt blue filter. The patient was asked to blink several times and then to stop blinking. The time taken from the last blink until the appearance of the first dark spot ‘which is randomly distributed’ on the cornea was noted. We calculated the average of three consecutive breakup times, determined manually using a stopwatch. Values of 10 s or less were considered dry eye.

Corneal and conjunctival fluorescein staining was evaluated approximately 2.5–3.0 min following fluorescein instillation, using cobalt blue illumination. Ocular surface staining was evaluated following the Oxford schema [27].

All patients underwent visual acuity testing, a thorough slit lamp examination, and indirect ophthalmoscopy on both eyes.

Laboratory investigations

We collected a venous blood sample from all patients, which were analyzed for measuring ESR measured by Westergen’s method (mm/h) [28], C-reactive protein (CRP), and RF measured by latex immunoassay (Plasmatec Laboratory Products Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh).

Also, in all blood samples, SSA (anti-RO) and SSB (anti-LA) antibodies had been estimated, using ELISA technique (lot n. VDS4203; Calbiotech Inc., El Cajon, California, USA). The procedure was done according to the manufacturer’s instructions as supplied with kit from Calbiotech Inc.

Measurement of serum level of anti-CCP and anti-MCV antibodies

Anti-CCP and anti-MCV antibodies were measured in all patients with RA. All blood samples were allowed to clot, and the serum was separated by centrifugation and stored at −20°C until analysis. Assay of anti-CCP and anti-MCV antibodies was performed by means of ELISA technique using human anti-CCP antibody ELISA Kit (ORGENTEC Diagnostika GmbH Company, Mainz, Germany) and the human anti-MCV antibody ELISA Kit (ORGENTEC Diagnostika GmbH Company). The assay procedures were followed as per the manufacturer’s instructions.

All biochemical measures were performed in a single batch, and a comparable number of patient and control samples were always assayed simultaneously in the same ELISA plate. The cutoff value for both anti-CCP IgG and anti-MCV IgG antibodies is 20 U/ml. The results recorded were considered positive if the readings were above cutoff values.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was done on a personal computer using the statistical package for social sciences, version 17.0 (SPSS, v. 17.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). Qualitative data were analyzed with Pearson’s χ2-test and were presented as n (%). Quantitative data were presented as mean (SD) or median, and interquartile ratio. Correlation analysis was performed by calculating Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r). Correlation between DAS and fluorescein test grading was performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

 Results



We performed a cross-sectional study on 69 patients with RA, with a mean age of 43.4±10.8 years. The recruited patients included 54 females and 15 males. The demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of patients with RA are shown in [Table 1].{Table 1}

Regarding ophthalmological examination, none of our patients showed any anterior segment abnormalities, other than the presence of visually insignificant cataract, of grades 1–2, according to LOCS III classification, with a visual acuity range for these patients of 20/40–20/20.

Moreover, no posterior segment abnormalities were detected on fundus examination. The mean best corrected visual acuity in recruited patients was 0.15±0.09 in logMAR (20/30 Snellen acuity).

Patients’ dry eye test results are shown in [Table 2].{Table 2}

Anti-CCP antibody serum levels showed a statistically significant correlation with DAS, CRP, Schirmer I-test, and ocular surface fluorescein staining (P=0.036, 0.018, 0.038, and 0.04, respectively), whereas anti-MCV antibody serum levels correlated significantly with DAS-28, ocular surface fluorescein staining, and OSDI score (P=0.04, 0.007, and 0.03, respectively) [Table 3].{Table 3}

Worthy of mention is that DAS showed a statistically nonsignificant correlation with OSDI score and all clinical tests of dry eye [Table 4].{Table 4}

We found OSDI score significantly correlated with Schirmer I-test values (P=0.036).

 Discussion



Ocular manifestations of RA can cause serious ocular morbidity. In our study, dry eye disease was the most common ocular manifestation. The correlation between dry eye and RA disease showed controversy in previous studies [5],[29],[30].

In our study, we evaluated anti-CCP and anti-MCV antibodies titers and correlated them with RA disease activity (DAS-28, HAQ, ESR, and CRP). We also correlated the antibody titers to OSDI scores and clinical tests of dry eye (Schirmer I-test, TBUT, and ocular surface fluorescein staining).

To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to evaluate the association between anti-MCV antibodies and the symptoms and clinical signs of dry eye in patients with RA.

We found both anti-CCP and anti-MCV antibodies significantly correlated with ocular surface fluorescein staining (P=0.04 and 0.007, respectively). Anti-CCP antibody serum levels also showed a statistically significant correlation with Schirmer I-test, whereas anti-MCV antibodies showed a significant correlation with OSDI scores. This denotes that positive antibodies titers correlate with dry eye disease existence.

In 2015, Vignesh and colleagues found a strong association between the presence of anti-CCP antibodies and dry eye disease in patients with RA, and dry eye was the most common ocular manifestation. This is comparable to our results [31].

Itty et al. [32], in their study, found that patients with combined presence of anti-CCP antibodies and RF had more severe ocular involvement compared with those who were negative for these antibodies.

On the contrary, other studies have found no positive correlation between anti-CCP and anti-MCV antibodies and extra-articular organ involvement [33],[34],[35].

It had been reported that anti-MCV antibodies were correlated with disease activity parameters such as DAS-28, ESR, CRP, serum RF levels, and tender joint and swollen joint count [1],[17],[18],[36]. This is in accordance to our results. However, analysis of the correlation between anti-CCP antibody titer and RA disease activity showed conflicting results. Some studies results were in accordance to ours, where they found that in patients with RA, the presence of anti-CCP antibody was associated with increased disease activity [37],[38],[39]. On the contrary, some studies found no significant correlation between anti-CCP antibody and disease activity (DAS-28 and HAQ) or inflammatory markers(ESR and CRP) [40],[41].

We found that dry eye symptoms and signs were not associated with severity of RA, as a nonsignificant correlation was found between clinical tests and symptoms of dry eye and DAS.

Our results imply that deterioration of the systemic condition of RA does not necessarily lead to aggravation of dry eye symptoms. Conversely, dry eye cannot be excluded, even in patients with only mild RA. These results are in agreement with Zakeri et al. [29].On the contrary, Wolfe et al. [30] revealed that the symptoms of dry eye are more common in patients with RA who had higher DAS, pain, and disability.

One of the possible explanations for these differences is the use of nonstandard regimes (such as steroids) that can affect the severity of the disease. Furthermore, DAS-28 formula is dependent on subjective individual’s tolerance to pain.

We had noticed that only six (8.70%) of our patients were positive for anti-Ro and anti-La antibodies. Those patients had a secondary Sjogren’s syndrome (SS). In the study of Fujita and colleagues, dry eye was common in patients with RA including those without SS. Interestingly, all patients with SS were positive for anti-Ro antibodies, and all patients without SS were negative for those antibodies [5]. It seems that the cause of dry eye may be different in patients with RA and SS than in patients with RA but without SS. The cause of dry eye in patients with RA might be the result of local pathology affecting the tear film, conjunctiva, or cornea because anti-Ro and anti-La antibodies had been found not only in the serum but also in the saliva, tear film, and labial salivary glands in patients with SS [42],[43].

An important finding in our study was that OSDI scores were significantly correlated with Schirmer I-test (ρ=0.4, P=0.046). This implies the possibility of using OSDI questionnaire by a rheumatologist as a preliminary assessment of dry eye in patients with RA before ophthalmological consultation. This finding is in agreement with Schiffman et al. [25], who found a low to moderate statistically significant correlation between OSDI and Schirmer test type I, TBUT, and fluorescein staining.

On the contrary, other studies showed that objective clinical signs often conflict with symptoms of dry eye disease [44],[45]. Studies on dry eye disease are still ongoing for reaching a consensus of clinical signs to better capture the disease and not to rely solely on disease symptoms in diagnosis and management.

 Conclusion



Dry eye is the most common ocular manifestation in our investigated patients with RA. Dry eye disease existence is not correlated with disease activity, hence all patients with RA should be regularly examined for dye eye regardless of disease severity. Rheumatologists to screen for dry eye disease in patients with RA could use OSDI questionnaire. The presence of anti-CCP and anti-MCV antibodies may denote the existence of dry eye disease and correlates with RA disease activity.

Acknowledgements

Costs were the responsibility of the authors, and instruments used in the study belong to Faculty of Medicine, a part of Ain Shams University, which is a public governmental organization.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Keskin G, Inal A, Keskin D, Pekel A, Baysal O, Dizer U, Sengul A. Diagnostic utility of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide and anti-modified citrullinated vimentin antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis. Protein Pept Lett 2008; 15:314–317.
2Prete M, Racanelli V, Digiglio L, Vacca A, Dammacco F, Perosa F. Extra-articular manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis: an update. Autoimmun Rev 2011; 11:123–131.
3Turesson C, Jacobsson L, Bergström U. Extra-articular rheumatoid arthritis: prevalence and mortality. Rheumatology 1999; 38:668–674.
4Turesson C, McClelland RL, Christianson TJH, Matteson EL. Multiple extra-articular manifestations are associated with poor survival in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2006; 65:1533–1534.
5Fujita M, Igarashi T, Kurai T, Sakane M, Yoshino S, Takahashi H. Correlation between dry eye and rheumatoid arthritis activity. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 140:808–813.
6Harper SL, Foster CS. The ocular manifestations of rheumatoid disease. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1998; 38:1–19.
7Zlatanović G, Veselinović D, Cekić S, Zivković M, Dorđević-Jocić J, Zlatanović M. Ocular manifestations in rheumatoid arthritis – different forms and frequency. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2010; 10:323–327.
8Hill JA, Southwood S, Sette A, Jevnikar AM, Bell DA, Cairns E. Cutting edge: the conversion of arginine to citrulline allows for a high-affinity peptide interaction with the rheumatoid arthritis – associated HLA-DRB1*0401 MHC class II molecule. J Immunol 2003; 171:538–541.
9Bang H, Egerer K, Gauliard A, Lüthke K, Rudolph PE, Fredenhagen G et al. Mutation and citrullination modifies vimentin to a novel autoantigen for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 56:2503–2511.
10Sghiri R, Bouajina E, Bargaoui D, Harzallah L, Fredj HB, Sammoud S, Ghedira I. Value of anti-mutated citrullinated vimentin antibodies in diagnosing rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int 2008; 29:59–62.
11Al-Shukaili A, Al-Ghafri S, Al-Marhoobi S, Alkaabi J. Evaluation of anti-mutated citrullinated vimentin antibodies, anti-cyclic citrullinated antibodies and rheumatoid factor in Omani patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Rheumatol 2012; 2012:285854.
12Liu X, Jia R, Zhao J, Li Z. The role of anti-mutated citrullinated vimentin antibodies in the diagnosis of early rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2009; 36:1136–1142.
13Besada E, Nikolaisen C, Nossent JC. Diagnostic value of antibodies against mutated citrullinated vimentin for rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2011; 29:85–88.
14Zhu T, Feng L. Comparison of anti-mutated citrullinated vimentin, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptides, anti-glucose-6-phosphate isomerase and anti-keratin antibodies and rheumatoid factor in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis in Chinese patients. Int J Rheum Dis 2013; 16:157–161.
15Bartoloni E, Alunno A, Bistoni O, Bizzaro N, Migliorini P, Morozzi G et al. Diagnostic value of anti-mutated citrullinated vimentin in comparison to anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide and anti-viral citrullinated peptide 2 antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis: an Italianmulticentric study and review of the literature. Autoimmun Rev 2012; 11:815–820.
16Dejaco C, Klotz W, Larcher H, Duftner C, Schirmer M, Herold M. Diagnostic value of antibodies against a modified citrullinated vimentin in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2006; 8:R119.
17Amin IR, Heidar HM. Differentiation between rheumatoid arthritis and chronic hepatitis C Virus associated arthropathy among Egyptian patients; does anti-mutated citrullinated vimentin have a role? Life Sci J 2014; 11:856–861.
18EL-Tanawy RM, Belal KM, Hassan WA, Said EA, Hafez SM. Assessment of serum antimutated citrullinated vimentin antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis. Egypt Rheumatol Rehabil 2015; 42:62–67.
19Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ. Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Against Rheumatism collaborative Rheumatology/European League initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2010; 69:1580–1588.
20Balsa A, Carmona L, González-Alvaro I, Belmonte MA, Tena X, Sanmartí R, EMECAR Study Group. Value of Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) and DAS28-3 compared to American College of Rheumatology defined remission in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2004; 31:40–46.
21Cardiel MH, Abello-Banfi M, Ruiz-Mercado R, Alarcon-Segovia D. How to measure health status in rheumatoid arthritis in non-English speaking patients: validation of a Spanish version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (Spanish HAQ-DI). Clin Exp Rheumatol 1992; 11:117–121.
22Bruce B, Fries JF. The health assessment questionnaire (HAQ). Clin Exp Rheumatol 2005; 23:S14.
23Hochberg MC, Chang RW, Dwosh I, Lindsey S, Pincus T, Wolfe F. The American College of Rheumatology 1991 revised criteria for the classification of global functional status in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumat 1992; 35:498–502.
24Walt JG, Rowe MM, Stern KL. Evaluating the functional impact of dry eye; the Ocular Surface Disease Index (abstract). Drug Inf J 1997; 31:1436.
25Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, Hirsch JD, Reis BL. Reliability and validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Arch Ophthalmol 2000; 118:615–621.
26Li N, Deng XG, He MF. Comparison of the Schirmer I test with and without topical anesthesia for diagnosing dry eye. Int J Ophthalmol 2012; 5:478.
27Bron AJ, Evans VE, Smith JA. Grading of corneal and conjunctival staining in the context of other dry eye tests. Cornea 2003; 22:640–650.
28Westergren A. On the stabilitary reaction of the blood in pulmonary tuberculosis. Br J Tuberculosis 1921; 15:72–76.
29Zakeri Z, Parsa M, Zanjani H, Ansarimoghaddam A, Sandoughi M, Aminifard M et al. Relationship between severity of RA and dry eye. Health Scope 2012; 1:186–188.
30Wolfe F, Michaud K. Prevalence, risk, and risk factors for oral and ocular dryness with particular emphasis on rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2008; 35:1023–1030.
31VigneshA PP, Srinivasan R. Ocular manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis and their correlation with anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies. Clin Ophthalmol 2015; 9:393–397.
32Sujit Itty BA, Pulido JS. Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide, Rheumatoid Factor, and Ocular Symptoms Typical of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2008; 106:75–83.
33De Rycke L, Peene I, Hoffman IEA, Kruithof E, Union A, Meheus L et al. Rheumatoid factor and anticitrullinated protein antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis: diagnostic value, associations with radiological progression rate, and extra-articular manifestations. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63:1587–1593.
34Korkmaz C, Us T, Kaşifoğlu T, Akgün Y. Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis and their relationship with extra-articular manifestations. Clin Biochem 2006; 39:961–965.
35Gonzalez-Lopez L, Rocha-Muñoz AD, Ponce-Guarneros M, Flores-Chavez A, Salazar-Paramo M, Nava A et al. Anticyclic citrullinated peptide (Anti-CCP) and anti-mutated citrullinated vimentin (anti-MCV) relation with extra-articular manifestations in rheumatoid arthritis. J Immunol Res 2014; 2014:536050.
36Mathsson L, Mullazehi M, Wick MC, Sjöberg O, van Vollenhoven R, Klareskog L, Rönnelid J. Antibodies against citrullinated vimentin in rheumatoid arthritis: higher sensitivity and extended prognostic Value concerning futureradiographic progression as compared with antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptides. Arthritis Rheumat 2008; 58:36–45.
37Papadopoulos NG, Tsiaousis GZ, Pavlitou-Tsiontsi A, Giannakou A, Galanopoulou VK. Does the presence of anti-CCP autoantibodies and their serum levels influence the severity and activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients? Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2008; 34:11–15.
38Del Amo NDV, Bosch RI, Manteca CF, Polo RG, Cortina EL. Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody in rheumatoid arthritis: relation with disease aggressiveness. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2006; 24:281–286.
39Miriovsky BJ, Michaud K, Thiele GM, O’Dell JR, Cannon GW, Kerr G et al. Anti-CCP antibody and rheumatoid factor concentrations predict greater disease activity in men with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2010; 69:1292–1297.
40Serdaroğlu M, Çakırbay H, Değer O, Cengiz S, Kul S. The association of anti-CCP antibodies with disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int 2008; 28:965–970.
41Shovman O, Gilburd B, Zandman-Goddard G, Sherer Y, Orbach H, Gerli R, Shoenfeld Y. The diagnostic utility of anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies, matrix metalloproteinase-3, rheumatoid factor, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein in patients with erosive and non-erosive rheumatoid arthritis. J Immunol Res 2005; 12:197–202.
42Ben-Chetrit ER, Fischel R, Rubinow A. Anti-SSA/Ro and anti-SSB/La antibodies in serum and saliva of patients with Sjogren’s syndrome. Clin Rheumatol 1993; 12:471–474.
43Toker E, Yavuz S, Direskeneli H. Anti-SSA/Ro and anti-SSB/La auto-antibodies in the tear film of patients with Sjogren’s syndrome. Br J Ophthalmol 2004; 88:384–387.
44Fuentes-Paez G, Herreras JM, Cordero Y, Almaraz A, González MJ, Calonge M. Lack of concordance between dry eyesyndrome questionnaires and diagnostic tests. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2011; 86:3–7.
45Sullivan BD, Crews LA, Messmer EM, Foulks GN, Nichols KK, Baenninger P et al. Correlations between commonly used objective signs and symptoms for the diagnosis of dry eye disease: clinical implications. Acta Ophthalmol 2014; 92:161–166.